ROSENBRETT

A PUBLIC FORUM FOR THE POPULAR VIEWS ON THE BETRAYAL AND SACRIFICE OF ROBERT, AS PERFORMED BY ROSE THE PRINCESS OF DORKNESS, AND AS VALIDATED BY THE COMPANY. THIS NIGHT-CRAWLING ABOMINATION NEEDS TO BE HELD UP TO THE LIGHT.

Wednesday, August 24, 2005

Crybaby's Post; HE'S GOOD ENOUGH TO USE, BUT NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO BE SEEN

I made a report to the compliance email. If there was some objective and fair handling of the matter, there wouldn't be any need for reports to the compliance address or for this blog. I didn't want the company line and I got the company line all right, and I think that my report did not get read or the company doesn't take reports seriously when pleased with its own decision. Does somebody get some malicious glee knowing that he is twisting in the wind? Does Rose get some feeling of innocence and satisfaction by transferring all guilt to him with the approval and protection of the company? No one takes her allegations seriously, but we take his discipline damn seriously. Was this supposed to show what the company will do when given a flimsy excuse to make an example of a good guy? I hear he is probably the best scientist the company has and probably is or was one of the most devoted employees, and with no fair process somebody stuck him with a criminal record, exiled him, and keeps him out of sight but always expects him to be available to help with the same attitude as before. I call that unethical. He was one of us, and the company should have defended instead of punished. We know him, so we know that the woman did not need to be defended against him. The worst outcome of defending the man and rejecting her allegations would have been a nuisance reaction from her. Couldn't the company put up with that to save Bob from this? Right, confidential information. With that open relationship they had, there is not any confidential information that would justify his treatment by the company. The confidential part is that we aren't supposed to know that. We are supposed to think that he brought it on himself. Any real confidential information is only confidential to protect the ones who were cruel, incompentent, and cowardly. Incompetent is not unethical, but cruel and cowardly are unethical. Does ethical and fair and reasonable and logical even mean anything here? This report is going to be blogged.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home