Robert Androse's Post; IT WAS AN ACT OF MALICE THAT SHOULD BE HANDLED LIKE ONE

Management needs to conduct a real and serious and objective investigation into the malicious and damaging report made by Rose. It was character assassination on Robert at no advantage to herself. If not outright lies, it was made in exaggerated and selective stories intended to show him as some kind of threat for reasons that she only knows. We all know what their friendship was all about, but the management with authority only knows her story. Maybe she was embarrassed because she USED to go for lunch or accept a flower or send e mails, but the timeline will prove that the relationship was over by written and accepted apology before she reported. One of two persons in a mutual consent relationship cant be allowed to bring down the other person after the relationship was mutually ended amicably just because she changed her mind or because the husband got pissed. Robert's character has been slandered, his career has been damaged, and his personality has been damaged and all this has been validated by the company just by accepting and reacting to what she said without a full investigation. In this new way of reporting we are trying to submit a good faith complaint, but its very hard not to tell the girl herself. Her report led to damage to one but to no good for anybody except herself maybe but she could have got the same thing by telling him. It doesn't matter how it was disguised, it was an act of malice and ought to be handled like one. Thank you.