ROSENBRETT

A PUBLIC FORUM FOR THE POPULAR VIEWS ON THE BETRAYAL AND SACRIFICE OF ROBERT, AS PERFORMED BY ROSE THE PRINCESS OF DORKNESS, AND AS VALIDATED BY THE COMPANY. THIS NIGHT-CRAWLING ABOMINATION NEEDS TO BE HELD UP TO THE LIGHT.

Thursday, October 27, 2005

Sonnschein's Post; THIS IS POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GONE RAVING MAD

I asked an executive and I was told to leave it alone or to not go there or something. was told that management knew that Bob didn't do anything wrong, and that everyone else knew it, and that it was not right, but that the company had to do something or Rose might make trouble.

Did she sign something saying that she wouldn't if the company stomped on him? If that is true we need a public explanation of that.

There was bad judgement all around. She was criticized for bad judgement too, but that's as far as it went. He got the discipline, and that is unfair. This blog gives me the chance to speak out against unfair disciplinary action since the compliance email is worthless.

Was he allowed to face his accuser? I know companies are not democratic, but companies should be fair and ethical -you know ETHICAL. What is fair is ethical and what is ethical is fair and legal should not have anything to do with it unless some law was broken, and we believe that there was not.

As I hear it they carried on a long time and agreed between themselves that neither would go to HR or anything and to talk to only each other if the relationship wore out. They agreed to end it and she accepted his promise and let him comply -you know COMPLIANCE-with her wishes, and then she backstabbed while he was complying and scared the company into keeping him invisible so she won't have a fainting spell or convulse or something because she is UNCOMFORTABLE around him.

This is unbelievable. She has no more right to be patronized and have him removed that I do to get removed those people that I am uncomfortable with, Rick, Graham, Rose, and that oficious little twit that does what Bob used to do.

But those people didn't do anything to me did they? and I protest that Bob did not do anything to Rose either.

NO good has come of this. The company is probably satisfied that the matter is resolved, but it isn't, and employees want to see it corrected. There is a backlash on her, and she encourages it by no feeling of remorse, and Bob is aging faster than before. She is blamed for singlehanded being the reason we didn't have an employee picnic.

Come on company, do it right. Get this fixed, even if you have to force the two parties to have a supervised meeting and make up just like you have to do with grade school kids. She might not like it, and he might not like it, but I bet it would be legal and it sure would be ethical.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home