Goody's Post; SHE APPEARED AFRAID WHEN SHE ACCUSED HIM. SHE WAS. SHE WAS AFRAID THAT WHAT SHE WAS DOING WOULD BE SEEN THROUGH

I am making this good faith compliance report of what happened to Bob at the instigation of Rose.

She enjoyed that relationship and was flattered by it and by the attention he gave her. It brought her out of a shell and did good things or her personality. She does not have to appreciate it and she has a right to change her mind, but she did not have to injure him and had no right to the outcome, and the company did wrong to validate her allegations by punishing Bob. I know that her report to management was tinged with drama and theatrics so that management gave in. She was afraid that what she was doing would be seen through. What did she allege, hostile and uncomfortable work environment? What a load of bollocks. It was her way of gaining his expulsion, and that's something she has no right to, and it should have been seen for what it was.

So there was a lawyer, and everything is legal. Just because something is legal and can be done doesn't mean it's right or has to be done or should be done.

This is probably so far in the rear view mirror that the company thinks it's over. Wrong, there is a stench that remains that does not go away with time, and most employees are savvy enough to know that Bob was treated unethically, and to recognize Rose's cruelty and backstabbing, and to recognize the clumsy and ridiculous gag order intended to keep the guilty from embarrassment.

With this report I suggest that the company re examine the issue, this time without prejudice in favor of the girl. Regardless of the popularity and respect held by the person involved - him, that is - there has been a severe assault on principle. No person or no issue should be dealt with in such a grossly unfair way.