Rosenbob's Post; THIS NIGHT-CRAWLING ABOMINATION NEEDS TO BE HELD UP TO THE LIGHT

The more the truth gets out the scarier it gets.

You must see it all as a big success for yourself. You can get days off with pay when he is in head office.
People don't see him much anymore because YOU don't want him around. You don't see him and you fixed it so nobody does. What a selfish plan, but you succeeded. Congratulations for manipulating the system and controlling HR. You don't want him coming to head office. Because your feeling guilty? Why feel guilty? A professional man who is good to you must deserve punishment for sure. You must need your revenge on somebody for being good to you. Let him suffer. You are empowered. You go girl. You go admit to that hateful act, and then go to confession.

Everybody knew about the lunch dates and the single flowers, and everybody knew you liked him, but did he stop when asked and then get dropped into it by you just as if he hadn't? Why would you ask him to stop, get his promise to stop, let him show that he stopped-you know why he missed the picnic-and then burn him anyway? Unless your intention was maximum injury, what did you have to gain by back stabbing that he didn't already agree to. You must have wanted something bad to happen to him or why go to HR after he agreed with what you wanted. There must be an agenda here. Somebody wants punishment or revenge. Your husband?

That was mean spirited and shameful. Why would you do that to a man who was so good to you? What was he suppose to do after agreeing to your wants.

You could have handled this better girl. If you didn't ever want to see him again, why not just tell him?
Do you know just how popular he is? Some people would like the attention from him that you got.
He was so sweet to you. He didn't have expectations except continue the friendship. We all need somebody like that and you killed it. Does anybody ever have enough friends to destroy one?

He has a strange kind of honor and wont even talk bad about you. This is the
kind of man who you gave as a burned offering. How can you be ok with that
What you did you don't do to another human being. How do you live with that?
Good god, woman, you liked him for how many years?

You go girl. Go whine to someone about this message. The ethics email has been notified because your act was unethical and its scary that you can get away with it and justify it to yourself. This message is to with HR too because they need to know what the opinions are on the street. Everybody should know the whole story, and you ought to know who has the support. This night crawling abomination needs to be held up to the light.

Mr. Huntley,

Personnel matters should be handled through HR we learned in compliance training and this is an HR matter, so handle it please. You may think its been handled but it wasn't handled right, and the more this story is out the scarier it gets.

You can think none of our business but it is because now it can get done to anyone at will for nothing. If she can take behavior that she liked and after its ended declare that its behavior she doesn't like and get him convicted and exiled because of it then nobody is safe.

Any respect for HR has been replaced with fear and disgust. An HR department that would let this happen has no credibility at all.

You could dismiss our concerns by saying that we don't know enough, but we probably know more than you do, because we know him and you don't, and some of us got to see their relationship for years, and you didn't, but you didn't talk to us. You talked to the ones the closest not the ones who knew the most, and he won't trash Rose but just would say what he had to defend himself.

For Mr. straight Company blue button down nice guy to be guilty of anything offensive to a woman is impossible and the notion would be laughable if there wasn't a tragedy here. Whatever you call it, it wasn't a problem while it was happening, if he was told to stop he would stop. We know why he didn't go to the picnic. What was he suppose to do? He followed her wishes. How could she claim anything if he stopped. Why did she ask him to stop if she was going to bust him anyway. he was maybe guilty of something but he doesn't deserve what happened. He can't go to HQ and thats shameful. What was done to her? Is Rose holding the company hostage?

You could dismiss our concerns by saying that we don't know the law. Right, we don't know that, but we know what harassment is and there wasn't any, or is it just whatever you say it is. Lawyers don't make it ethical, maybe the opposite.

The welcome contact had stopped as asked, and then there was no unwelcome contact because there was no contact at all. He didn't do anything she objected to while it was happening.

This was no good faith complaint. It had a hidden agenda maybe from the husband or it was malicious, and everybodys disgust has been told to her. You just don't do that to another human being. Her agenda was unjustly indulged at his expense. She sacrificed him to you and you sacrificed him to PC.

That announcement on July 26 was lame. Is everybody suppose to think that he was in the wrong job for all these years? Why not say it like it is. This outrage ought to be exposed for what it is. Don't forget who started this. She might get this message too. He might get it too. They both ought to know who has support. Everybody might get it. We know who has the popular support, so do you.

This could have been mediated, because she accepted apology. Then she betrayed. This could have been a win win situation by mediation, but maybe we look better to EEOC this way. Look! We got a big one. We disciplined a top professional for being ugly to a clerk. Probably the reason he wasn't fired is that would hand the older guy in the protected group a winning law suit, but the woman can only cause trouble but not win a suit with bad faith allegation.
He loses, you lose, and only Rose wins by getting you not letting him in head office, is that so she won't feel guilty to see him? She can get a day off with pay, and that is disgraceful.

Everybody who saw them go out to lunch thought it was sweet. She was enjoying the attention.She just decided for some reason she didn't want him around, and broke a promise, and you supported this back stabbing. The system was manipulated and Rose did it. What was her discipline? She must have a big sense of accomplishment when she ought to have a big feeling of guilt.

Why not fix a decision from a wrong one based on PC to a fair one based on facts. We don't want a reply and we sure don't want to hear that the company didn't have a choice, we just want you to fix an unethical injustice. There will be a lot less disgruntled employees if you do.

Free to express ideas without fear of reprisal, if we believed it we wouldn't use anonymous e mail.