Lying; An Acceptable Management Tool for Defending a Bad Decision

Most all accept that Robert sent that touching message to the guerilla supporters just because of how it was written, but his optimism or gullibility led to nowhere did it. Nobody believes that Robert deluded himself into thinking that good might happen, so he must have got the optimism by being lied to by somebody who thinks lying is an acceptable management tool for defending a bad company decision. That is hr, and there must have been hr involvement, because there was no way that Robert could have all those e mail addresses. He sent that message because he was told to, and hr gave him the addresses.

Same goes for that comment on Roses website from last August, it looks like something he wrote too. For all the good it did him, he should be embarrassed by it now, and that comment ought to be deleted.

Its time again to hold the night crawling abomination up to the light. It didn't fare very well in the employees survey last year did it.

If it means email messages all around and more placings on the website, lets get started.

Free to express ideas without fear of reprisal.

FACE Intel and Elie Wiesel

This is being posted with hopes Rick Huntley and his Superiors will read and do some serious thinking...

Former and current employees of Intel have formed their own support group due to similar and even worse circumstances than the unjust situation of Robert.
The good news is that some of the suffering Intel employees have brought lawsuits against Intel and have won. Fancy that, the small against the mighty...Food for thought...

Some information provided at the FACE Intel site include:
Regarding harassment - "Legal claim based on defamation entitles victim to recover against defamer for his or her emotional damages..."; "In addition, the victim will be entitled to sue for punitive or punishment damages..."; "Defamation can be proven on word alone..."; "Don't have to prove damages, they are assumed. The employer has to PROVE the statements were true..."; (Don't think this was handled properly, do you?) "Each repetition of a defamatory remark is a new injury..."; "Defamatory statement must also seem to state a fact, or that it is based on fact..."; (According to lunchtime witnesses, etc..., don't think Rose's allegations are true) "A defamatory statement in a personnel file defames you for as long as the statement is in the file..."; (Could be costly for Caleb Brett)

One link provided on the FACE Intel site takes one to the site of: CorpWatch.org, which is dedicated to holding corporations accountable for their actions...

As a compliment to all anonymous supporters of injustice in the workplace, here is a quote from Elie Wiesel:
"There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest."

Regards to all.

Another One Bites The Dust

It is with no disrespect to a fine music group (Queen) that their song title is used for such a nasty situation.
The reference is to yet another year going by for Robert, and it is for him one year closer to retirement.
Robert believes those seeing truth and resolution to injustice have lost interest, and because life does get in the way of things this is understandable.
Angelus does hope those with opinion keep on keeping on...
In fact, a pint will be raised - hopefully not spilled on anyone or anything - but raised to salute everyone involved in this worthy pursuit.

Making a comparison: If this situation were a football, baseball or soccer game, and if the referee made a bad call it can either be viewed on a big screen for all to see, or kept somewhat private but given a fair review. Not always, but most of the time.
Would it not be interesting to see management's actions on a company-wide big screen?
Can't get away with much this way.

Regards to all, and thank you for continued support of a weary man who has not done wrong.

Angelus