Patticake's Post; ANSWERING QUESTIONS FROM JANET DOE

Dear Janet Doe,

So many questions to so many places, and not all the questions can be answered.

Bob doesn't know who we are for good reason. We don't know who we all are either. Contributors have come and gone. This blog is leaderless. We won't ever be public because those who work for the company have jobs to worry about.

More than the person, we support principle. The man got screwed by the company and got screwed by the girl who seems now to be Jekyll and Hyde. Promised never to do that then did it. We would support any person who got it like that.

Bob didn't know about Rosenbrett for a long time, but it seems he knows now.

At his age he might go for for the lawyer, but it would be against Rose for slander or defamation, not his company.

In this court of public opinion, we would like to see Rose and Huntley convicted. We can only hope that Mr. Super scientist and Super gentleman can work till an honorable retirement.

Unfortunately, this blog probably won't do much good in the long range. It's impossible to perpetuate it. We have gained members and we have lost members. Momentum is OK for now, but no one knows for how long. We will try. Your offer of your own involvement is appreciated.

We don't think any bloggers were interviewed in the matter, and we don't believe there was a written report from Rose. We believe the HR VP handled it all incompetently.

Rose's demeanor seems to be one of no remorse and like nothing ever happened. No one who saw them can understand that callousness. It's possible that someone has sent anonymous message to Rose suggesting recant, but I think it's not known for sure. It may not matter if she would or not, because even if she would, the whole matter probably is out of her control now. HR has it, and they seem to be pleased with what they have done.

You are surely an outsider. No matter. We think there are other outsiders. If you haven't been invited to join, you probably will be, and you are welcome to do so and post.

You must be a scientist or a musician or both.

You could have contacted Gault - you could have contacted anyone. There is no membership hierarchy or organization.

Welcome, if you stay.

Justitia's Post; THIS IS INSULTING TO ALL OF US WHO KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. WHY IS THE COMPANY SO AFRAID OF LETTING THE TRUTH OUT?

It was a reliable source that leaked that the company suggested that Robert should seek counseling to handle the effects of what was caused to him.

The company probably thinks that they are making a compassionate and kind and noble gesture.

The Dilbert principle is alive and well in our company.

To set up arbitrary conditions causing damage to a person and then offer to help treat the effects, when the right thing to do is to remove the cause, is insulting.

That is like hanging a big anchor on someone and then offering to help them learn to swim with it, when the right thing is to remove the anchor.

Almost as insulting is making us not talk about it. Is that to make it appear that everything is right or that what happened is right, or that nothing happened?

Just as insulting is setting somebody to watch Bob and report if he talks. That's more like Machiavelli than Dilbert.

Why is the company so afraid of letting the truth out? Is it just company ego? The company can't admit mistakes? You know an error isn't a mistake unless you don't correct it, so it looks like the company wants to make a mistake in the eyes of its employees.

There would be much less backlash if the company had done the right thing first.

Shannon Kiddo's Post, Converted from Anonymous Comment

This is a great site! Almost everybody around the company already knows what happened, but this lays it out for ALL to see.

It needs some graphic in that empty space next to the members names.

A good one would be a tall redheaded girl stabbing a short bald guy in the back. The girl would have a forked tongue and maybe two faces. Standing by could be a couple vps trampling on justice and the ethics policy.

Anybody know how to do it?

Sonnschein's Post; THANKS ANONYMOUS OF 1.7.06. SOME OF YOUR COMMENT IS WORTHY, BUT SOME OF IT IS NOT, AND IT CAN'T STAY

Your comment has been removed.

If you want to be part of this blog, and if you can stay with the issue, you can join. Send a working Email address to

nostroma@fastmail.fm

To prove that you are the same person that made the deleted comment, you need to include that unappropriate last sentence of your comment.

If you do not want to post yourself you can still send to the Email address and someone will do it for you, or you can keep commenting and any worthwhile comments might be changed to postings. There are some people that want to do it like that.

7HN-R37's Post; ROSE, HOW MUCH DAMAGE DID YOU INTEND?

Why couldn't you just tell him what you wanted and then just let it happen? You don't want to see him again, that could be your right, but you don't have a right to everything you caused.

You deprived more people than you know. With his life experiences, he would have made a valuable adult male friend for Andy, with the things happening with Andy now, and you know what I mean.

Did you really have to deprive all of us?

Cruel? Selfish? Egotistical? Controlling husband? All?